I recently completed a short paper quantitatively analyzing officiating in the NBA.  The paper is currently under review at an academic journal and posted on SSRN for free download.  Given its "working paper" status, any comments would be appreciate.  A link to the paper is here.  The abstract is below.  Zach Lowe of Grantland highlighted the paper in this piece.
Given  confidentiality issues and the proprietary nature of the underlying  data, outsiders rarely have the opportunity to test the impetus, impact,  and efficacy of employee discipline in the workplace.  However, the  transparency of NBA basketball officiating allows for such an inquiry,  as long-time referee Joey Crawford was involved in a much-publicized  2007 on-court incident with Tim Duncan of the San Antonio Spurs that  resulted in a lengthy suspension. Shortly after the suspension, Duncan  spoke of Crawford’s “personal vendetta” against him and expressed hope  that he and his team would “get a fair shake” and avoid any “backlash”  from other referees.  This paper analyzes the interaction between  Crawford (and other referees) and the Spurs team and reveals that  Duncan’s concerns were illusory in 2007 and remain spurious (pun  intended) today.  In the course of analyzing every Spurs game (N = 1038)  over the course of eleven seasons, neither Crawford nor any of his  fellow referees exhibited any systematic bias against Duncan or his  team.  

Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar