![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhNOstQTlwkLugWi1K_X12ZN9T-ZM6htAY8A6bdS48jOZscDSa4zaj0UKdzLXfXQZt0PhQyRqOoFc8XCZHDeGcowanr4l3PCDJc8XldWo1SF5E7U3EANqNc4TzGHwcSgcjiQAkIbmfD8jKa/s200/Pennsylvania_State_University_seal.svg.png)
Over at Forbes, I wrote this morning about why aspects of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania's decision in the 'Penn State' case were wrongly decided. In the article, I explain that the court made dubious presumptions that the NCAA is not a commercial actor (a longstanding mistake of the Third Circuit) and that the NCAA president's actions are not innately concerted.
Here is a link to the full article, discussing both points in far greater detail.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar